Customer-confirmed pilots or deployments
Named customer, workflow, site, operating context, commercial agreement, or expansion signal.
Evidence Intake
Submit a signal worth reviewing.
Help Humanoids Watch improve the evidence layer for humanoid robotics. Send public sources about pilots, deployments, vendor claims, corrections, availability, and buyer-relevant market signals.
Review Scope
What is useful to send.
Updates to existing records
Corrections to robot profiles, vendor pages, use-case pages, source dates, or deployment context.
Commercial and buyer access signals
Pricing, availability, support model, pilot access, service regions, or procurement-relevant constraints.
Evidence that changes the assessment
Public sources showing a claim is outdated, unsupported, contradicted, or missing important context.
Email Checklist
A useful submission is specific.
You do not need a polished memo. A short email with the right source context is enough for us to review the signal.
- Robot or vendor name
- Customer, partner, or deployment site
- Source URL and source date
- What the source appears to show
- Why it matters for buyers
- Known caveats, limits, or corrections
Signal Quality
The more context, the stronger the signal.
Best signals
Named customer, defined task, date, operating context, and public source.
Useful signals
Credible announcement, partner confirmation, technical detail, or correction with a traceable source.
Weaker signals
Vague claims can still be useful when they point to a source we should review.
Review Process
What happens after you send it.
Source review
We check whether the source is public, specific, current, and relevant to humanoid deployment intelligence.
Evidence classification
We assess source type, evidence quality, validation level, buyer relevance, and visible limitations.
Record update
Useful signals may update Robot, Deployment, Vendor, Use Case, or methodology-linked evidence pages.
Evidence Review
Have a public source worth reviewing?
Send it to the evidence desk. Submission helps us review the signal, but does not guarantee publication or a change in assessment.